(a)
Purpose. The purpose of Administrative Design Review is to enable
the Community Development Director or his/her assigned to review minor
development projects that otherwise meet the zoning regulations, in
terms of the appropriateness of the design. The Community Development
Director or his/her assigned shall review:
(1)
All new single-family
residences;
(2)
All additions to existing
single-family residences where the combined addition is greater than
500 square feet of gross floor area to the dwelling and/or any accessory
building;
(3)
All additions to existing
single-family residences that entail expansion of floor area above
the first story;
(4)
All additions of less
than 1,000 gross square feet to multiple-family residential developments
containing four or more units;
(5)
All floor area additions
to residential developments containing two to three units;
(6)
All new residential developments containing two to 15 units on any lot, subject to a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section. Any two to 15 unit development involving more than two adjacent lots shall be subject to Planning Commission Design Review pursuant to Section 10-2.2502;
(7)
The addition of an accessory dwelling unit or the addition of two units on a lot that already contains an existing single-family residence (see definition of accessory dwelling unit in Section 10-2.402);
(8)
The addition of a third
unit on a lot that already contains two units;
(9)
All Tier 2 AHO projects,
which shall be allowed by-right and approved if all objective standards
are met, consistent with State law.
(10)
All housing development
projects in which at least 20% of the units are dedicated for lower
income households and are located on properties identified in Appendix
B of the 2021-2029 Housing Element meeting the requirements of either
a or b below, which shall be allowed by-right and approved if all
objective standards are met, consistent with State law.
a.
Housing Element - Reused
Sites. The proposed project site is: (1) listed on Table B-1 in the
2021-2029 Housing Element; (2) identified as a site used in a prior
housing element; (3) not listed as vacant; and (4) satisfies any portion
of the City's lower income RHNA requirement.
b.
Housing Element - Rezoned
Sites. The proposed project site is listed on Table B-2 in the 2021-2029
Housing Element and identified in Table B-2 as satisfying any portion
of the City's low- or very low-income RHNA requirement.
(b)
Criteria. The following criteria shall be used in determining a project's
consistency with the intent and purpose of this section:
(1)
All the provisions of this chapter are complied with;
(2)
Traffic congestion or impairment of traffic visibility is avoided;
(3)
Pedestrian safety and welfare are protected;
(4)
The design is compatible with the overall community and surrounding
neighborhood;
(5)
The location and design of the project shall not adversely impact
surrounding properties or harmfully impact the public health, safety
and general welfare;
(6)
The architectural style and design of the project shall:
a.
Enhance the neighborhood, contribute beneficially to the overall
design quality and visual character of the community, and maintain
a stable, desirable character,
b.
Make use of complementary materials and forms that are harmonious
with existing improvements and that soften the appearance of volume
and bulk, while allowing flexibility for distinguished design solutions,
c.
Avoid a box-like appearance through variations in the roof line and
building elevations and through distinguishing design features,
d.
Continue on all elevations the architectural character established
for the street facing elevations to the extent feasible,
e.
Ensure that the physical proportions of the project and the manner
in which the project is designed is appropriate in relation to the
size, shape, and topography of the site,
f.
Include windows on the front façade,
g.
Provide sufficient area available for use of extensive landscaping
to complement the architectural design of the structure, and to minimize
the amount of paving to the degree practicable,
(7)
The project shall comply with the Objective Residential Standards
adopted by resolution of the City Council. If there is a conflict
between "Criteria" (1) through (6) with the Objective Residential
Standards, the Objective Residential Standards shall prevail.
(8)
The project shall be consistent with the intent of the Artesia and
Aviation Corridors Area Plan as adopted by resolution of the City
Council.
(c)
Application.
(1)
The applicant shall file with the Community Development Department
a completed application in a form provided by the Community Development
Department. A completed application for plan check submitted to the
Building Division also constitutes an application for the purposes
of this section.
(2)
The owner of record of the lot or parcel of property which is to
be affected by the application shall file an affidavit authorizing
the application on a form provided by the Community Development Department.
(3)
Upon the filing of an application, the applicant shall pay a fee,
as set forth by resolution of the City Council.
(d)
Contents of application. In addition to the application and fee,
a site plan, floor plan, and elevations of the project drawn to scale
and dimensioned shall be submitted which include the following information
as applicable:
(1)
Existing topography and proposed grading;
(2)
Existing trees with a trunk diameter of six inches or greater;
(3)
All buildings and structures, and the uses within each room;
(4)
Improvements in the public right-of-way, including location of sidewalk,
parkway, curb, gutter, street width to centerline, and dedications;
(5)
Exterior lighting;
(6)
Easements;
(7)
Off-street parking areas, including the stall striping, aisles, and
driveways;
(8)
The lot dimensions;
(9)
Setbacks and spaces between buildings;
(10)
Walls, fences, and landscaping and their location, height, and
materials;
(11)
Landscaping areas;
(12)
Trash and recycling facilities;
(13)
The architectural elevations of all sides of all structures
depicting design, color, materials, textures, ornaments, or other
architectural features;
(14)
The location, dimensions, and design of all signs;
(15)
A section of the building as it relates to the existing topography
and proposed grading where the slope of the site is greater than four
feet;
(16)
Such other data as may be required to demonstrate that the project
meets the criteria.
(e)
Notice of pending decision. Notice of a pending decision by the Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall be given as follows for all nonresidential development under subsection (a)(9) and for new multiple-family developments. For purposes of this section, new multiple-family developments shall mean development of two or three dwelling units on a vacant lot or in conjunction with demolition of 50% or more of the total floor area of existing development on the lot. New development shall not include an "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in Section 10-2.402.
(1)
By mailing a written
notice thereof, not less than 10 working days prior to the date of
pending approval to the applicant, to the owner of the subject property
and to the owners of properties within 300 feet of the exterior boundary
of the subject property or properties; such notices shall be sent
by first class mail, with postage prepaid, using the addresses from
the last adopted tax roll, if available;
(2)
By posting such notice
in at least one prominent place on or about each parcel which is the
subject of the proposed action, or upon utility poles or sticks along
or about the street line of such parcel; and
(3)
The content of the notice
of pending decision for an Administrative Design Review shall contain
the following information:
a.
The date of filing of
the application and the name of the applicant,
b.
The file number assigned
to the application,
c.
A description of the
proposed development and its location,
d.
The date at which the
application is expected to be approved, and
e.
A statement that revisions
to the proposed project will be considered by the Community Development
Director or his/her assigned upon the written request of any person
provided that such written request is received by the Community Development
Director or his/her assigned within 10 working days from the date
of sending the notice.
(f)
Decision on application. The Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall review the application and shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application. Projects meeting the requirements of Section 10-2.2500 (a)(9) or (10) shall be approved if found in compliance with the applicable objective standards per Criteria (7).
(1)
If the decision of the
Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to approve the
application, an approval stamp shall be affixed to the plans.
(2)
If the approval requires
conditions, the conditions will be made part of the approved plans.
(3)
If the project requires
a notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section,
no decision will be made until completion of the deadline for written
requests for revisions. If no written request for revisions is received,
the Community Development Director or his/her assigned shall make
a decision pursuant to this subsection. If a written request for revisions
has been received prior to the deadline, notice of the decision shall
be mailed by first class mail within seven days of the decision to
the applicant and the person that provided the written request for
revisions to the proposed project.
(4)
If the decision of the
Community Development Director or his/her assigned is to deny the
application, the decision shall be in writing and shall recite the
failure to meet the criteria upon which the decision is based. Where
the decision is to deny the application, notice of the decision shall
be mailed to the applicant by first class mail within seven days of
the decision.
(g)
Appeal of decision. The decision of the Community Development Director shall be final and conclusive unless, within 10 days after the date of such decision, a written appeal is filed with the Community Development Department requesting a public hearing before the Planning Commission. In the case of projects not subject to notice of pending decision pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, only the applicant and/or property owner may appeal the decision of the Community Development Director.
(h)
Setting hearings. The Community Development Department shall set
an appeal for a public hearing before the Planning Commission in a
timely fashion.
(i)
Notice of public hearing before the Planning Commission. Notice of
public hearing before the Planning Commission to consider an appeal
of the decision of the Community Development Director or his/her assigned
shall be given as follows:
(1)
By publication at least once in a weekly newspaper of general circulation
in the City not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the
public hearing; and
(2)
By mailing a written notice thereof, not less than 10 days prior
to the date of such hearing to the applicant, to the owner of the
subject property and to the owners of properties within 300 feet of
the exterior boundary of the subject property or properties; such
notices shall be sent by first class mail, with postage prepaid, using
the addresses from the last adopted tax roll, if available; and
(3)
By posting such notice in at least one prominent place on or about
each parcel which is the subject of the proposed action, or upon utility
poles or sticks along or about the street line of such parcel. In
the event more than one parcel is the subject of such hearing, and
such parcels comprise 200 or more feet of street frontage, at least
one such notice shall be posted on or about the street line at intervals
of not less than 200 feet, starting at either end of the subject properties
where the property line intersects the street line.
(j)
Decision of the Planning Commission. The decision of the Planning
Commission on all applications shall be final and conclusive unless,
by 5:00 p.m. of the tenth (10th) day following such decision (or of
the next working day if the tenth (10th) day falls on a weekend or
holiday):
(1)
A written appeal on the form designated by the City is filed by any
interested party with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing before
the City Council stating the grounds for the appeal and all required
fees for said appeal are paid in full; or
(2)
The Mayor or a member of the City Council requests a public hearing
before the City Council stating the grounds for the appeal. Provided
however that the City Council member or Mayor requesting the appeal
shall disqualify him or herself from hearing the appeal unless he
or she can certify in writing that the appeal is being requested as
a result of public interest in the decision to be reviewed and he
or she has no predisposition against or in favor of the project. The
City Council as a whole shall be prohibited from voting to appeal
any matter in which they will sit as the reviewing body.
|
Such Appeal, Or City Council Request For A Public Hearing, Shall
Be Set For A Public Hearing By The City Clerk In A Timely Fashion.
|
(k)
Notice of public hearing before the City Council. Notice of public hearing before the City Council to consider an appeal of the decision of the Planning Commission shall be given pursuant to subsection (i) of this section.
(l)
Decision of the City Council. The decision of the City Council on
all applications shall be final and conclusive.
(m)
Expiration. An approval subject to Administrative Design Review shall
become null and void unless vested within 36 months after the date
of the approval. Such time limits may be extended by the Community
Development Director or his/her assigned upon the written request
of the applicant and the presentation of proof of an unusual hardship
not of the applicant's own making. If an established time limit for
development expires, and no extension has been granted, the approval,
and all rights and privileges established therein, shall be considered
null and void.
(n)
Revocation. After notice to the applicant and subject to appeal to
the Planning Commission, the Community Development Director or his/her
assigned may revoke or modify any Administrative Design Review approval
issued on one or more of the following grounds:
(1)
That the approval was obtained by fraud or misrepresentation;
(2)
That the use for which such approval was granted has ceased for a
period of at least 18 consecutive calendar months;
(3)
That changed circumstances have rendered exercise of the approval
as originally granted infeasible or inimical to the health, safety
and welfare of the community;
(4)
That there has not been substantial compliance with the terms and
conditions of the approval;
(5)
That exercise of the approval violates any State, Federal or local
statute or regulation;
(6)
That exercise of the rights under the approval is detrimental to
the health, safety and welfare of the community;
(7)
That exercise of the rights under the approval constitutes a nuisance.
|
At any hearing on revocation or modification the permittee and
any other person whose property rights are affected by revocation,
modification, or continuance of the exercise of rights under the approval,
shall have the right to produce any arguments and introduce any evidence
in support of their position.
|
(Ord. 2756 c.s., eff. January
18, 1996, as amended by Ord. 2786 c.s.,
eff. January 2, 1997; § 6, Ord. 2884 c.s., eff. May 2, 2002, §
5, Ord. 2911 c.s., eff. October 16, 2003, § 12, Ord. 2917 c.s., eff. October
21, 2003, § 4, Ord. 2957 c.s., eff. February 17, 2005, § 1, Ord. 3107 c.s., eff. February 8, 2013, § 1, Ord. 3108 c.s., eff. February 8, 2013, § 2, Ord. 3236 c.s., eff. September
16, 2022, § 3, Ord. 3257 c.s., eff. August 17, 2023, Ord. 3259-23 c.s., eff. October 19, 2023, and Ord. 3282-24 c.s., eff. December 12, 2024)
