A.
Residential development fee.
(1)
Within all zoning districts of the Borough, developers of residential
development, except as specifically exempted below, shall pay a fee
of 1.5% of the equalized assessed value for residential development,
provided that no increased density is permitted pursuant to N.J.S.A.
40:55D-70d(5).
(2)
When an increase in residential density pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70d(5)
(known as a "d variance") has been permitted, residential developers
shall be required to pay a residential development fee of 6% of the
equalized assessed value for each additional unit that may be realized.
However, if the zoning on a site has changed during the two-year period
preceding the filing of such a variance application, the base density
for the purposes of calculating the bonus residential development
fee shall be the highest density permitted by right during the two-year
period preceding the filing of the variance application. Example:
If an approval allows four units to be constructed on a site that
was zoned for two units, the fees could equal 1.5% of the equalized
assessed value on the first two units and the specified higher percentage
up to 6% of the equalized assessed value for the two additional units,
provided that zoning on the site has not changed during the two-year
period preceding the filing of such a variance application.
B.
Exemptions and partial exemptions for residential development.
(1)
Affordable housing developments and developments where the developer
has made a payment in lieu of on-site construction of affordable units
shall be exempt from residential development fees.
(2)
Developments which otherwise meet the definition of "residential development" but are required to pay the nonresidential development fee pursuant to the Statewide Non-Residential Development Fee Act, shall be exempt from residential development fees pursuant to § 31A-2A only as to the portion of the development for which a nonresidential development fee was paid pursuant to the Stateside Non-Residential Development Fee Act.
(3)
Developments that have received preliminary or final site plan approval
prior to the adoption of Ord. No. 21-2009[1] shall pay the residential development fee in effect at
the time of these aforementioned approvals, unless the developer seeks
a substantial change in the approval. Where a site plan approval does
not apply, a zoning and/or building permit shall be synonymous with
preliminary or final site plan approval for this purpose. The fee
percentage shall be vested on the date that the building permit is
issued.
[1]
Editor's Note: Ord. No. 21-2009 was adopted 12-10-2009.
(4)
When an existing structure undergoes a change to a more intense use,
is demolished and replaced, or is expanded, residential development
fees shall be imposed and collected on the increase in the equalized
assessed value of said structure, unless otherwise exempt from the
residential development fee requirement.
(5)
Developers of residential structures demolished and replaced as a
result of a natural disaster shall be exempt from paying a residential
development fee.
[Amended 6-8-2023 by Ord. No. 14-2023]
(6)
Within duly designated redevelopment areas, developers of residential development shall pay the residential development fee set forth in the redevelopment agreement between the Borough and the developer. Residential development fees included in redevelopment agreements may not exceed the limits set forth in § 31A-2A.
C.
Developers of nonresidential development shall be obligated to comply
with the requirements of the Statewide Non-Residential Development
Fee Act.
D.
Developers of mixed-use development shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Statewide Non-Residential Development Fee Act for the portion of the development consisting of nonresidential development and the requirements of this § 31A-2A and B for the portion of the development consisting of residential development, provided that no affordable housing obligation shall be imposed which would result in an affordable housing obligation greater than that which would have been imposed if the residential development portion of the mixed-use development would have been developed independently of the nonresidential portion of the mixed-use development.